Recently I talked to someone about a view calling another view, a practice which is known as nested views. TL;DR Do not write Nested Views. Give this person a little credit, he had heard it was a bad idea, but he had a really good reason. There is no such thing. There is also no reason to take my word for it. Here are a number of other very good posts which detail why nested views are bad from a performance perspective.
7 sins against TSQL Performance
Nested Views Causing Query Performance Woes
Poor Little Misunderstood Views
Proving Views Can Hurt Performance
T-SQL Anti-Patterns: Nested Views
I understand that on the internet, no matter how cockamamie your idea is, you can find someone or some post which will agree with you. That is why I trust sources who I know and trust rather than the random chatter of places like Stack Overflow.
Non-Performance Reasons Not to Use Nested Views
In addition to the performance reasons, there are other reasons not to use nested views. Supporting and maintaining nested views can be a nightmare. If there is an issue with the accuracy of the data, finding the problem is just that much harder. And what about when one needs to go investigate or fix a problem? Then someone has to test all of the places the view is called. I worked with some code recently where a view was created on a set of data just to create 3 new values based up 3 case statements. That view was nested many levels below where the field was actually called. I know people from a development background look at nested views as modular development. Don’t. TSQL is not the same as object oriented code.
Good Use Cases for Creating Views
Views are not always a bad idea. If you are creating an Analysis Services or Power BI project, it is a good idea to create views of the tables you are going to be using, even if there is no difference between the view and the table. Why? That way if the table is changed, your project will still work. Exposing a single view to users who are going to use self-service BI against it can also be a good idea. None of these are reasons to nest views, ensuring that the source data is anything other than a table.
If all you have is a Hammer Everything Looks like a Nail
It takes a while to learn how to write good SQL and I have seen people rely on a view because it takes a while longer to write good SQL. Relying on a view though is like having one tool in the toolbox. If you don’t have a screwdriver, one may be tempted to use a Hammer instead. Too often nested views are written because sometimes writing SQL is hard and it is easier to just write a query and save it as a view rather than use a CTE or a derived table. Do not succumb to the temptation. There is a lot of code written where someone as in a hurry and they were planning on going back and fixing it someday. Someday appears with the same frequency as a lottery. Make it easier on the person who has to figure out or maintain the code left in your wake. Don’t write nested views. Your replacement will thank you for it.
Data aficionado et SQL Raconteur